Du bist nicht angemeldet.
EnigmaG
Senior Member
On the aquaero 5 only the fan 4 has the capability to control a fan/pump via PWM control signal.
Zitat
12. Einstellungen Regler (aquasuite/Gerätemenü)
aquasuite: Klicken Sie auf die Geräteseite „Regler“ unterhalb des zu konfigurierenden
Gerätes, um die Konfiguration der Regler vorzunehmen. Es werden
nur die aktuell konfigurierten Regler angezeigt, um neue Regler hinzuzufügen,
klicken Sie auf das Plus-Symbol oben rechts in der Reglerübersicht.
Gerätemenü: Wählen Sie „Regler“ aus der Menüliste aus und bestätigen Sie
durch Drücken der mittleren seitlichen Taste.
Hinweis zu Unterschieden in der Bedienung: In der aquasuite wird auf der
Seite „Regler“ auch die Zuordnung der Regler zu den Ausgängen vorgenommen.
Im Gerätemenü werden die Regler in der jeweiligen Ausgangskonfiguration
zugeordnet. Des Weiteren werden in der aquasuite zur besseren Übersicht
nur Regler angezeigt, denen sowohl eine Datenquelle als auch ein Ausgang
zugeordnet ist. Im Gerätemenü werden immer alle Regler angezeigt,
auch nicht konfigurierte Regler
ff
AE5 Port 4 is optional PWM or voltage.
AE6 Port 1-4 is optional PWM or voltage.
On the aquaero 5 only the fan 4 has the capability to control a fan/pump via PWM control signal.
How do you control speed using PWM? I couldn't see any option in the software and someone here said it would always be at 100% at pwm through Aquaro 5.
I can choose between Power Controlled, Speed Controlled or PWM Controlled. PWM always went 100 %
Dintid
Full Member
Dieser Beitrag wurde bereits 1 mal editiert, zuletzt von »Dintid« (11. Februar 2015, 22:47)
To follow up on this discussion.
The pump was at fault. Or rather Laings non-PWM standard production is at fault. I got it confirmed from Swiftech, that their pump does not follow PWM-Specifications, but they don't know how, why or what Laing changed, so they can't post how it deviates.
I talked a lot to both Aquaro staff and Swiftech, and they agree on it from both sides. What tricked me here is how it worked fine with Asus PWM control, but that is because it doesn't follow PWM specs either..
In short, he Pump does not advertise its "pull up" signal on pin 4 (the 5v control signal) and Aquaro can't control it / doesn't see it as PWM (it wasn't clear to me, but the result is the same).
It's nice when people try to help out, but I could do without the arrogance displayed by some. Don't help if you don't want to.
Some made a real effort and I applaud that. It's just often people are being total Jerks if someone else can't figure something new out.
Dintid
Full Member
To follow up on this discussion.
The pump was at fault. Or rather Laings non-PWM standard production is at fault. I got it confirmed from Swiftech, that their pump does not follow PWM-Specifications, but they don't know how, why or what Laing changed, so they can't post how it deviates.
I talked a lot to both Aquaro staff and Swiftech, and they agree on it from both sides. What tricked me here is how it worked fine with Asus PWM control, but that is because it doesn't follow PWM specs either..
In short, he Pump does not advertise its "pull up" signal on pin 4 (the 5v control signal) and Aquaro can't control it / doesn't see it as PWM (it wasn't clear to me, but the result is the same).
It's nice when people try to help out, but I could do without the arrogance displayed by some. Don't help if you don't want to.
Some made a real effort and I applaud that. It's just often people are being total Jerks if someone else can't figure something new out.
There is a way to wire the 5v pull up circuit;
http://www.overclock.net/t/1474470/ocn-a…0#post_21956203
Dieser Beitrag wurde bereits 1 mal editiert, zuletzt von »Dintid« (11. Februar 2015, 23:33)
Dintid
Full Member
Yes I read it myself. OK, I'm done trying to help you.
Yes I read it myself. OK, I'm done trying to help you.
It's just rather hard when people throw links about them and not add their own experiences to them. Sorry if my natural sceptism of single-liners forum helpers offended you.
Many people only post for post-Count, so have to have some substantiality other than just a link reference.
Dintid
Full Member
Yes I read it myself. OK, I'm done trying to help you.
It's just rather hard when people throw links about them and not add their own experiences to them. Sorry if my natural sceptism of single-liners forum helpers offended you.
Many people only post for post-Count, so have to have some substantiality other than just a link reference.
Post count? I'm 62 years old...I don't care about childish crap like that, I assure.
I know the lady that wrote that post I linked. She is something of an electronics wiz and is always coming up with her own circuits and controllers for her pc's.
Zitat
I use OpenHardwareMonitor to get the cpu and gpu temperatures and then use aquasuite to find the average of those temperatures and control the pump with a curve using that value.
I suppose it does but that situation almost never happens for me. When either cpu or gpu get too hot the other is never so far behind as to make for a biased reading. (They are both on separate loops)Hi Jenko,
I am fairly new to water-cooling and am curious about your concept of:
Zitat
I use OpenHardwareMonitor to get the cpu and gpu temperatures and then use aquasuite to find the average of those temperatures and control the pump with a curve using that value.
If the GPU is idling, and the CPU is 100%, does the average temp then not reduce water flow to the CPU?
Please understand, I am NOT flaming... I am trying to learn.
You're right, beyond 60% (around 160 l/h) there is really no improvement (at least from my experience).Do you see a significant decrease in temperatures when you speed up the pumps?
I did some very limited testing on my own and it confirmed the general consensus that after a certain flow rate is achieved, gains from higher flow rate are minimal, so it's always interesting to me when people use a different setup.
Kind regards,
Boris.
Dieser Beitrag wurde bereits 2 mal editiert, zuletzt von »Jenko97« (11. März 2015, 22:34)
-