• 22.06.2025, 16:00
  • Register
  • Login
  • You are not logged in.

 

Dear visitor, welcome to Aqua Computer Forum. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains how this page works. You must be registered before you can use all the page's features. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.

dopax007

Junior Member

Calibration of analog temperature sensors ?

Tuesday, June 28th 2011, 10:21pm

Greetings to all :

I want to know what method uses aquaero 5 with respect to the CALIBRATION of analog temperature sensors with respect to the real temperature . ¿ How do I have to calibrate it ? ¿ what is the most suitable software to monitor such real reference, to make that the most accurate calibration possible?.


Thanks to all

sebastian

Administrator

Wednesday, June 29th 2011, 9:19am

you can enter for each sensor a offset value.

dopax007

Junior Member

Wednesday, June 29th 2011, 11:40am

Greetings and many thanks , Sebastian :
Let's see if i have understood correctly ; ¿ something as well as an estimate of
value with regard to the best reference real possible? , Because if so, I repeat
my question ¿ with what software i consulting monitor such reference , the closest to the
real temperature possible?
Thanks, and forgive the, more than likely, my very bad English

Shoggy

Sven - Admin

Wednesday, June 29th 2011, 12:27pm

The aquaero has an offset option which allows you to change the temperature by max. +/- 6°C.

For example you read out 20°C but the real temperature is 21,5°C, than you would add 1,5°C with the offset function. The offset function is a separate part inside the device so in all overview screens or in the software etc. you will only see the real temperature (21,5°C).

dopax007

Junior Member

Wednesday, June 29th 2011, 4:52pm

Many thanks Shoggy :

I imagined that it would be something like that ; a correction to the estimated value, by the impossibility of placing the probes in the best possible place , with regard to the real value .
For example, in CPU , if i can't put the probe in the best possible site ( below the die by example ) the value that will mark the probe, normally , will be below the real value .
Then , I must try to monitor with Everest , coretemp , Motherboard Monitor , etc....( ¿ what would be better for this task ? ) and try to get as much as possible to the real temperature in order to make that correction estimate ...............¿ what I've understood correctly ?

Greetings

Shoggy

Sven - Admin

Thursday, June 30th 2011, 1:29pm

Yes, correct.

dopax007

Junior Member

Thursday, June 30th 2011, 3:40pm

many thanks Shoggy

Similar threads