• 25.01.2026, 11:49
  • S’inscrire
  • Connexion

  • Vous n’êtes pas connecté.

 

Aquaero 5 LT slave device Q

Bonjour, visiteur, bienvenue sur les forums Aqua Computer Forum. Si c’est votre première visite, nous vous invitons à consulter l’Aide. Elle vous expliquera le fonctionnement de cette page. Pour avoir accès à toutes les fonctionnalités, vous devez vous inscrire. Pour cela, veuillez utiliser le formulaire d’enregistrement, ou bien lisez plus d’informations sur la procédure d’enregistrement. Si vous êtes déjà enregistré, veuillez vous connecter.

Enser

Junior Member

Aquaero 5 LT slave device Q

mercredi 13 janvier 2016, 00:55

I have another AQ 6 XT & a AQ 5 LT on the way to make a master/slave controller config. I have also ordered real time clock modules for the extra Aquabus port. Since I need to connect them via aquabus to make the master/slave config, can I use the other Aquabus port off the RTCs to take advantage of MPS devices to run off the AQ 5 LT?

barfly

Full Member

mercredi 13 janvier 2016, 02:11

all devices need to be connected via the high aquabus,a y splitter cable can be used for this.,the low aquabus is not usable at this time.

InfoSeeker

Senior Member

RE: Aquaero 5 LT slave device Q

mercredi 13 janvier 2016, 02:27

Citation de "Enser"

I have another AQ 6 XT & a AQ 5 LT on the way to make a master/slave controller config. I have also ordered real time clock modules for the extra Aquabus port. Since I need to connect them via aquabus to make the master/slave config, can I use the other Aquabus port off the RTCs to take advantage of MPS devices to run off the AQ 5 LT?

Yes, the two high speed aquabus ports on top of the clock can be used as if they were a Y-splitter.

Enser

Junior Member

mercredi 13 janvier 2016, 19:11

Ok, so than if I use the RTCs or Y cable I can have side 'a' of the Y go from AQ6 to the AQ5 (slave), and the other side of the Y cable (side 'b') to connect 4 MPS devices to each AQ (to get 8 total MPS devices between the two AQ).
Like this:









Code source

 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

| AQ 6 XT          |
| Aquabus High | ——> MPS1, MPS2, MPS3, MPS4
	|
	|
	| (Aquabus High link)
	|
| AQ 5 LT (slave mode) |
| Aquabus High	     | ——-> MPS1, MPS2, MPS3, MPS4





This was I was hoping to achieve... let me know if this design will function. Thanks!

Ce message a été modifié 1 fois. Dernière modification effectuée par "Enser" (13 janvier 2016, 19:28)

Enser

Junior Member

mercredi 13 janvier 2016, 19:58

I should also mention my setup:
I am running 2 parallel loops, one for CPU & mobo / one for GPU (3 way SLI).
Each loop has 2 D5s in serial (Aquabus D5s). I also have an MPS flow meter (MPS 400) & an MPS pressure sensor (MPS 500) for each loop.
This make a total of 8 MPS devices.
If the above master/slave topology does not expand to a total of 8 MPS than I will be forced to run each AQ seperately (2 MPS pumps + flow MPS + pressure MPS).
This would not be ideal, thus why I wish to configure my setup as above....

Railgun

Full Member

mercredi 13 janvier 2016, 20:03

You can also use one of these...

http://www.modmytoys.com/pcb.html

InfoSeeker

Senior Member

mercredi 13 janvier 2016, 20:45

Citation de "Enser"

I should also mention my setup:
I am running 2 parallel loops, one for CPU & mobo / one for GPU (3 way SLI).
Each loop has 2 D5s in serial (Aquabus D5s). I also have an MPS flow meter (MPS 400) & an MPS pressure sensor (MPS 500) for each loop.
This make a total of 8 MPS devices.
If the above master/slave topology does not expand to a total of 8 MPS than I will be forced to run each AQ seperately (2 MPS pumps + flow MPS + pressure MPS).
This would not be ideal, thus why I wish to configure my setup as above....

Four (4) is the maximum number MPS devices that can be controlled by an aquaero.
You have to set a unique aquabus address for each device, and MPS has four designated addresses - 12, 13, 14 & 15.
The aquabus devices addresses is listed in a table in the manual in section 25.1. 'Compatible aquabus devices'.

Ce message a été modifié 1 fois. Dernière modification effectuée par "InfoSeeker" (13 janvier 2016, 20:47)

Discussions similaires