Sie sind nicht angemeldet.
Lieber Besucher, herzlich willkommen bei: Aqua Computer Forum. Falls dies Ihr erster Besuch auf dieser Seite ist, lesen Sie sich bitte die Hilfe durch. Dort wird Ihnen die Bedienung dieser Seite näher erläutert. Darüber hinaus sollten Sie sich registrieren, um alle Funktionen dieser Seite nutzen zu können. Benutzen Sie das Registrierungsformular, um sich zu registrieren oder informieren Sie sich ausführlich über den Registrierungsvorgang. Falls Sie sich bereits zu einem früheren Zeitpunkt registriert haben, können Sie sich hier anmelden.
Dieser Beitrag wurde bereits 3 mal editiert, zuletzt von »InfoSeeker« (21. Dezember 2014, 18:18)
Dieser Beitrag wurde bereits 1 mal editiert, zuletzt von »avictord« (22. Dezember 2014, 08:41)
Dieser Beitrag wurde bereits 1 mal editiert, zuletzt von »InfoSeeker« (22. Dezember 2014, 17:45)
Dieser Beitrag wurde bereits 1 mal editiert, zuletzt von »InfoSeeker« (31. Dezember 2014, 04:49)
Dieser Beitrag wurde bereits 2 mal editiert, zuletzt von »avictord« (1. Januar 2015, 23:52)
Dieser Beitrag wurde bereits 2 mal editiert, zuletzt von »InfoSeeker« (2. Januar 2015, 01:02)
True that, I will not need to change MPS addresses going forward.After you initialy configure MPS addresses at aquasuite, you no longer need USB cables, then you only need 1 USB from aquaero to motherboard, and the MPS devices connected through aquabus to the aquaero via 4pin aquabus cables.
You should not need to reconfigure MPS addresses.
I see now why you are doing what you are doing InfoSeeker. Makes sense. Excellent that it's all working and Great set Up. It must be impressive.Yes, a sweet device that fits a need.
Correct, I ended up with 7 out of 8 available USB ports... and since I needed 5, life is good
Thank you for highlighting the IU01 for me avictord.
I ran the setup on the test bench for a few hours without any issues, so I think I am good to go.
The reason I do not run a 2nd USB lead, is that the Aquaero and 4 MPS devices are placed inside the Gigant 1680, which is located a distance from the system itself.
Also, the Gigant has the power & a USB 'B' connector integrated in one of the panels, and I wanted to stay as clean as possible on the outside.
[attach]4967[/attach]
I also use the NZXT IU01 Internal USB hub for my Aquacomputer system (Aquero 6 XT, 2 AC D5 pumps with USB, AC "high flow" G1/4" flow sensor, AC Temperature sensor, and Farbwerk USB RGB LED controller). Best $20 you could spend.
Dieser Beitrag wurde bereits 1 mal editiert, zuletzt von »InfoSeeker« (18. Januar 2015, 14:37)
Hi Bytales,I keep seeing that one is required to hook stuff on USB to "configure it", then once that is done, one can leave it on "aquabus" connection.
I dont believe there is a clear explanation anyowhere as to what can be done and cannot be done using devices on USB vs AQUABUS.
This "configuration" you speak of, that requires USB, what exactly is one configuring ?
If this is so, should i aim to connect everything on USB ? I want to connect it at first and leave it be as it is.
Why would anyone choose then AQUABUS over USB connection if AQUABUS fails in doing stuff that can be done on USB ?
Because i can buy an NZXT internal USB HUB and connect everything through it, as opposed to aquabus.
I though aquabus was better in that one would be abe to connect stuff through it directly to the AquaAero, which then uses only one USB connection with the PC.
I think Aquacomputer should make a sticky post somewhere where it is clearly explained what Aquabus really is able to do, how it functions, etc. I dont believe there is such a post anywhere !
USB is used to configure the device (screen shots below), and aquabus is used by the aquaero to read the device to use the sensor's output values for conditional control.This "configuration" you speak of, that requires USB, what exactly is one configuring ?
Normaly, once configured, you do not need to reconfigure, and for cable management reasons the USB cables may be removed.If this is so, should i aim to connect everything on USB ? I want to connect it at first and leave it be as it is.
It is not a choice of which is better, but a choice of keeping USB cabling or not. The 3 screen shots above are not available if a USB connection is not in place.Why would anyone choose then AQUABUS over USB connection if AQUABUS fails in doing stuff that can be done on USB ?
I though aquabus was better in that one would be abe to connect stuff through it directly to the AquaAero, which then uses only one USB connection with the PC.
Dieser Beitrag wurde bereits 2 mal editiert, zuletzt von »InfoSeeker« (19. Januar 2015, 13:28)
-