Sie sind nicht angemeldet.
Lieber Besucher, herzlich willkommen bei: Aqua Computer Forum. Falls dies Ihr erster Besuch auf dieser Seite ist, lesen Sie sich bitte die Hilfe durch. Dort wird Ihnen die Bedienung dieser Seite näher erläutert. Darüber hinaus sollten Sie sich registrieren, um alle Funktionen dieser Seite nutzen zu können. Benutzen Sie das Registrierungsformular, um sich zu registrieren oder informieren Sie sich ausführlich über den Registrierungsvorgang. Falls Sie sich bereits zu einem früheren Zeitpunkt registriert haben, können Sie sich hier anmelden.
Dieser Beitrag wurde bereits 3 mal editiert, zuletzt von »Jakusonfire« (17. Mai 2017, 13:59)
It looks like soft tubing, there is no way it should create enough stress to MPS internals unless pulled out and fittings itself had to handle way more stress than that...Looks like there may have been some stress on the connection between the fitting and the MPS200.
The tube on the left out of the Tee Block looks lower than the tube on the inlet side of the MPS 200.
That is forcing a slope between the two tube sections that is causing the fittings to stress.
The MPS 400 inlet fitting appears to have more space on the bottom than the top, i.e. not a square fit.
This pressure may have caused a failure in the MPS 200 housing over time.
You may consider modifying the tubing a bit on the refit.
It looks like soft tubing, there is no way it should create enough stress to MPS internals unless pulled out and fittings itself had to handle way more stress than that...
There is a very particular method needed to install the gasket without leaking. It should be placed on the sensor prongs outside of the housing and the whole PCB inserted back in.
I recommend looking at the overclock.net community testing thread for more details
Zitat
You could remove the stainless steel cover of the sensor, remove the screw on the inside and pull out the sensor board sidewards. There is a gasket that covers the two nozzles of the black sensor head. Remove it and check that the gasket and nozzles are clean. When you assemble it again, push the gasket in the case and not onto the nozzles first because it is likely that if you pull them too much over the nozzles, there will be no proper contact to the holes in the case. Just let the nozzles do the job when you slide in the sensor board again.
Dieser Beitrag wurde bereits 1 mal editiert, zuletzt von »InfoSeeker« (4. Mai 2017, 16:39)
There is a very particular method needed to install the gasket without leaking. It should be placed on the sensor prongs outside of the housing and the whole PCB inserted back in.
I recommend looking at the overclock.net community testing thread for more details
I am looking at this gasket on my MPS pressure sensor atm, and the reassembly instructions provided by Shoggy varies a bit as to the order of things.
A snippet from the email sent me:
Zitat
You could remove the stainless steel cover of the sensor, remove the screw on the inside and pull out the sensor board sidewards. There is a gasket that covers the two nozzles of the black sensor head. Remove it and check that the gasket and nozzles are clean. When you assemble it again, push the gasket in the case and not onto the nozzles first because it is likely that if you pull them too much over the nozzles, there will be no proper contact to the holes in the case. Just let the nozzles do the job when you slide in the sensor board again.
Dieser Beitrag wurde bereits 3 mal editiert, zuletzt von »Jakusonfire« (17. Mai 2017, 13:56)
[snip]
The coolant leaking out of the small holes in the back of the sensor is definitely a gasket leak though. The fittings might stress the threads but they aren't connected to the internals where the small screw holes are. Water there can only come through the gasket.
[snip]
The coolant leaking out of the small holes in the back of the sensor is definitely a gasket leak though. The fittings might stress the threads but they aren't connected to the internals where the small screw holes are. Water there can only come through the gasket.
@jakusonfire please, I am not being argumentative, just trying to understand the issue...
In examining the case of my MPS flow 400, the holes on the backside appear to be for mounting the device to a support bracket... they do not penetrate into the cavity where the electronics and the gasket sits. So even were the cavity full of fluid, it would not have a path to leak out those mounting holes on the back, unless there were a crack in the case between the cavity & the mounting holes.
And since it appears the electronics module is still functioning (failure was not expressed in op), it may also be a crack in the case between the main flow path and the mounting holes.
Hopefully @gahlaktus will have time to tell us what he finds after he replaces the MPS flow 200 in his rig.
Dieser Beitrag wurde bereits 7 mal editiert, zuletzt von »Jakusonfire« (30. Mai 2017, 18:21)
Dieser Beitrag wurde bereits 1 mal editiert, zuletzt von »Jakusonfire« (31. Mai 2017, 03:26)
-