23.04.2024, 12:04
Sprache ändern
Registrieren
Anmelden
Sie sind nicht angemeldet.
Lieber Besucher, herzlich willkommen bei: Aqua Computer Forum. Falls dies Ihr erster Besuch auf dieser Seite ist, lesen Sie sich bitte die Hilfe durch. Dort wird Ihnen die Bedienung dieser Seite näher erläutert. Darüber hinaus sollten Sie sich registrieren, um alle Funktionen dieser Seite nutzen zu können. Benutzen Sie das Registrierungsformular, um sich zu registrieren oder informieren Sie sich ausführlich über den Registrierungsvorgang. Falls Sie sich bereits zu einem früheren Zeitpunkt registriert haben, können Sie sich hier anmelden.
Dienstag, 13. August 2013, 17:31
I have prototyped the alternate approach in my sandbox (commit a104b34be9290dee691529ce6dee08a8ff87fcc8). I need to give it some more testing though since I did manage to hang my devel box a few times as I was tweaking things. I must admit, this is the most fragility I have seen with stuff running in user space on Linux for a long time and I have been a Linux hacker since kernel 0.99pl8...
did you freeze youre whole machine or only the AE5-USB-Interface? (just to determine if i deploy your sandbox on my productive machine...)
The whole machine got funny as though it was out of file handles. I was working remotely (via SSH) and my session locked up. I attempted to log in again remotely and a few times I was able to get past the authentication prompts, but my session froze soon after. Ultimately I had to (remotely) power-cycle the machine.
I would suggest holding off on testing unless you have a machine you can tolerate going offline. I should have some cycles later on tonight to give it a more thorough test myself.
Mittwoch, 14. August 2013, 16:26
I have prototyped the alternate approach in my sandbox (commit a104b34be9290dee691529ce6dee08a8ff87fcc8). I need to give it some more testing though since I did manage to hang my devel box a few times as I was tweaking things. I must admit, this is the most fragility I have seen with stuff running in user space on Linux for a long time and I have been a Linux hacker since kernel 0.99pl8...
did you freeze youre whole machine or only the AE5-USB-Interface? (just to determine if i deploy your sandbox on my productive machine...
The whole machine got funny as though it was out of file handles. I was working remotely (via SSH) and my session locked up. I attempted to log in again remotely and a few times I was able to get past the authentication prompts, but my session froze soon after. Ultimately I had to (remotely) power-cycle the machine.
I would suggest holding off on testing unless you have a machine you can tolerate going offline. I should have some cycles later on tonight to give it a more thorough test myself.
Hi folks hold tight for a little longer. I didn't get time to work on aerotools-ng last night due to family commitments, and will be on a business trip for a few days. I should be able to pick it back up towards the end of the week.
Samstag, 17. August 2013, 11:01
I have prototyped the alternate approach in my sandbox (commit a104b34be9290dee691529ce6dee08a8ff87fcc8). I need to give it some more testing though since I did manage to hang my devel box a few times as I was tweaking things. I must admit, this is the most fragility I have seen with stuff running in user space on Linux for a long time and I have been a Linux hacker since kernel 0.99pl8...
did you freeze youre whole machine or only the AE5-USB-Interface? (just to determine if i deploy your sandbox on my productive machine...
The whole machine got funny as though it was out of file handles. I was working remotely (via SSH) and my session locked up. I attempted to log in again remotely and a few times I was able to get past the authentication prompts, but my session froze soon after. Ultimately I had to (remotely) power-cycle the machine.
I would suggest holding off on testing unless you have a machine you can tolerate going offline. I should have some cycles later on tonight to give it a more thorough test myself.
Hi folks hold tight for a little longer. I didn't get time to work on aerotools-ng last night due to family commitments, and will be on a business trip for a few days. I should be able to pick it back up towards the end of the week.
I did some more testing and further tweaking on the prototype in my sandbox and have reduced the thrashing quite a bit from the initial version with read() removed. It seems to be working reliably for me, but would appreciate if were tested on a few other machines so I can validate the approach before merging in to the aerotools-ng repo for further testing.
The portion of the output from sandbox/HID-testing/hiddev/bin/test I am looking for from a single run looks like this:
|
Quellcode |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
** getting the 8x 0xC reports: Value at 3 on page 0 matches (C0). Loop iteration 1 Value at 3 on page 1 matches (C2). Loop iteration 2 Value at 3 on page 2 matches (C4). Loop iteration 4 Value at 3 on page 3 matches (C6). Loop iteration 5 Value at 3 on page 4 matches (C8). Loop iteration 7 Value at 3 on page 5 matches (CA). Loop iteration 9 Value at 3 on page 6 matches (CC). Loop iteration 11 Value at 3 on page 7 matches (CE). Loop iteration 12 Last array index was 4184, number of wrong reports was 5 |
Also, if you could run sandbox/HID-testing/test-loop.sh and provide me the last line of output, I would be most appreciative.
Sonntag, 18. August 2013, 13:16
output from testloop
output from your test-binary:output.txt
did you need more?
|
|
Quellcode |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 |
Buffer too small. Report length 660, buffer length 658 Iteration 990 Buffer too small. Report length 660, buffer length 658 Iteration 991 Buffer too small. Report length 660, buffer length 658 Iteration 992 Buffer too small. Report length 660, buffer length 658 Iteration 993 Buffer too small. Report length 660, buffer length 658 Iteration 994 Buffer too small. Report length 660, buffer length 658 Iteration 995 Buffer too small. Report length 660, buffer length 658 Iteration 996 Buffer too small. Report length 660, buffer length 658 Iteration 997 Buffer too small. Report length 660, buffer length 658 Iteration 998 Buffer too small. Report length 660, buffer length 658 Iteration 999 Buffer too small. Report length 660, buffer length 658 Iteration 1000 Buffer too small. Report length 660, buffer length 658 Test completed in 18 minutes and 50 seconds Encountered 0 failures during test (0%). Attempt success rate 100.00% |
output from your test-binary:output.txt
did you need more?
Sonntag, 18. August 2013, 21:58
output from testloop
Quellcode
output from your test-binary:[attach]4286[/attach]
did you need more?
Thanks Raptor 2101,
Sorry about that, but I neglected to provide a change that is needed for firmware 1028-1030 (I am still testing with 1027). Please set REPORT_DATA_LEN (line 199 in sandbox/HID-testing/hiddev/src/test.c) to 660 for your setup, recompile and try again.
Montag, 19. August 2013, 03:06
new tests - new results
Quellcode
Hmm, that's not good. It looks like the delay timing needs to be tweaked a bit. Can you post a few extracts (of the lines I provided earlier) of both success and failure runs?
Montag, 19. August 2013, 08:55
new tests - new results
Quellcode
Hmm, that's not good. It looks like the delay timing needs to be tweaked a bit. Can you post a few extracts (of the lines I provided earlier) of both success and failure runs?
will do this this evening
Montag, 19. August 2013, 20:45
On Success:
on Error:
interestingly: the errors only occure in the last 1/3 of the itterations (itteration 700 and above). Not on error occur during the first 700 tries
|
|
Quellcode |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 |
** getting the 8x 0xC reports: Value at 3 on page 0 matches (C0). Loop iteration 1 Value at 3 on page 1 matches (C2). Loop iteration 3 Value at 3 on page 2 matches (C4). Loop iteration 4 Value at 3 on page 3 matches (C6). Loop iteration 6 Value at 3 on page 4 matches (C8). Loop iteration 7 Value at 3 on page 5 matches (CA). Loop iteration 9 Value at 3 on page 6 matches (CC). Loop iteration 10 Value at 3 on page 7 matches (CE). Loop iteration 12 Last array index was 4184, number of wrong reports was 5 watermarks match! |
on Error:
|
|
Quellcode |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 |
** getting the 8x 0xC reports: Value at 3 on page 0 matches (C0). Loop iteration 0 Failed to find enough matching report pages after 50 iterations! Oops watermark at offset 20B is 00 (index 6), but should be 100! Trying again... Attempt 2 Sending the following request in report 0x9: >> usage_index=0 usage_code=0xFF000001 value=1 HIDIOCGFIELDINFO: field_index=522 maxusage=523 flags=0x2 physical=0x0 logical=0x0 application=0xFF000001 logical_minimum=0,maximum=255 physical_minimum=0,maximum=0 |
interestingly: the errors only occure in the last 1/3 of the itterations (itteration 700 and above). Not on error occur during the first 700 tries
Montag, 19. August 2013, 21:48
On Success:
Quellcode
This all looks good and essentially matches what I saw on my slower dev system.
on Error:
Quellcode
interestingly: the errors only occure in the last 1/3 of the itterations (itteration 700 and above). Not on error occur during the first 700 tries
Most curious... It would appear as though either all of a sudden your USB communication speed with the Ae5 got a lot faster (which would suggest reducing the delay) or, there were a bunch of signals being sent to aerotools-ng which is causing the nanosleep loop to restart a lot and loose the delay timing precision. Was there anything interesting/different going in on your system in that last 300 iterations compared with the first 700?
To test the first theory, can you try changing:
|
|
Quellcode |
1 |
req.tv_nsec = 8000000L; /* 0.008 seconds */ |
to
|
|
Quellcode |
1 |
req.tv_nsec = 7000000L; /* 0.007 seconds */ |
and let me know if there are any changes in behavior?
Dienstag, 20. August 2013, 20:40
|
|
Quellcode |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 |
** getting the 8x 0xC reports: Value at 3 on page 0 matches (C0). Loop iteration 6 Value at 3 on page 1 matches (C2). Loop iteration 8 Value at 3 on page 2 matches (C4). Loop iteration 10 Value at 3 on page 3 matches (C6). Loop iteration 11 Value at 3 on page 4 matches (C8). Loop iteration 13 Value at 3 on page 5 matches (CA). Loop iteration 15 Value at 3 on page 6 matches (CC). Loop iteration 17 Value at 3 on page 7 matches (CE). Loop iteration 19 Last array index was 4184, number of wrong reports was 12 watermarks match! ** getting the 8x 0xC reports: Value at 3 on page 0 matches (C0). Loop iteration 7 Value at 3 on page 1 matches (C2). Loop iteration 8 Value at 3 on page 2 matches (C4). Loop iteration 10 Value at 3 on page 3 matches (C6). Loop iteration 12 Value at 3 on page 4 matches (C8). Loop iteration 14 Value at 3 on page 5 matches (CA). Loop iteration 17 Value at 3 on page 6 matches (CC). Loop iteration 19 Value at 3 on page 7 matches (CE). Loop iteration 21 Last array index was 4184, number of wrong reports was 14 watermarks match! ** getting the 8x 0xC reports: Value at 3 on page 0 matches (C0). Loop iteration 1 Value at 3 on page 1 matches (C2). Loop iteration 3 Value at 3 on page 2 matches (C4). Loop iteration 4 Value at 3 on page 3 matches (C6). Loop iteration 7 Value at 3 on page 4 matches (C8). Loop iteration 9 Value at 3 on page 5 matches (CA). Loop iteration 11 Value at 3 on page 6 matches (CC). Loop iteration 13 Value at 3 on page 7 matches (CE). Loop iteration 15 Last array index was 4184, number of wrong reports was 8 watermarks match! ** getting the 8x 0xC reports: Value at 3 on page 0 matches (C0). Loop iteration 2 Value at 3 on page 1 matches (C2). Loop iteration 5 Value at 3 on page 2 matches (C4). Loop iteration 7 Value at 3 on page 3 matches (C6). Loop iteration 9 Value at 3 on page 4 matches (C8). Loop iteration 11 Value at 3 on page 5 matches (CA). Loop iteration 13 Value at 3 on page 6 matches (CC). Loop iteration 15 Value at 3 on page 7 matches (CE). Loop iteration 17 Last array index was 4184, number of wrong reports was 10 watermarks match! |
Ähnliche Themen
-
English forum »-
Aquaero 5 USB protocol
(19. August 2012, 23:53)
-
- English forum »
-
Aquasuite on linux
(8. Juni 2007, 13:28)